nanog mailing list archives
Re: SUP720 vs. SUP32
From: Adrian Chadd <adrian () creative net au>
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 04:34:12 +0900
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009, Bill Blackford wrote:
Thank you to everyone who offered advice. I thinks it's clearer what my path should be. Incidentally, I am using 7300/7200 based units with G1 RP and found that at 200M they start seeing 50% CPU load which is why I'm looking to go to the next step.
Check the cisco-nsp archive, specifically from Rodney; he has talked about what the CPU load versus throughput implications are on the G1 and G2. It might surprise you a little. Adrian
Current thread:
- SUP720 vs. SUP32 Bill Blackford (Mar 11)
- Re: SUP720 vs. SUP32 Adrian Chadd (Mar 11)
- Re: SUP720 vs. SUP32 Brian Feeny (Mar 11)
- Re: SUP720 vs. SUP32 Brian Feeny (Mar 11)
- Re: SUP720 vs. SUP32 Jon Lewis (Mar 11)
- RE: SUP720 vs. SUP32 Bill Blackford (Mar 11)
- Re: SUP720 vs. SUP32 Adrian Chadd (Mar 11)
- RE: SUP720 vs. SUP32 Norrie, David (Mar 18)
- Re: SUP720 vs. SUP32 Adrian Chadd (Mar 18)
- RE: SUP720 vs. SUP32 Holmes,David A (Mar 18)
- Re: SUP720 vs. SUP32 Adrian Chadd (Mar 11)
- Re: SUP720 vs. SUP32 Mark Tinka (Mar 11)
- Re: SUP720 vs. SUP32 Larry Stites (Mar 11)
- RE: SUP720 vs. SUP32 Holmes,David A (Mar 11)