nanog mailing list archives
Re: Facility wide DR/Continuity
From: Roland Dobbins <rdobbins () arbor net>
Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 22:05:34 +0700
On Jun 3, 2009, at 9:37 PM, William Herrin wrote:
If you can afford it, stretch the LAN across the facilities via fiber and rebuild the critical services as a load balanced active-active cluster.
I would advise strongly against stretching a layer-2 topology across sites, if at all possible - far better to go for layer-3 separation, work with the app/database/sysadmin folks to avoid dependence on direct adjacencies, and gain the topological freedom of routing.
----------------------------------------------------------------------- Roland Dobbins <rdobbins () arbor net> // <http://www.arbornetworks.com> Unfortunately, inefficiency scales really well. -- Kevin Lawton
Current thread:
- Facility wide DR/Continuity Drew Weaver (Jun 03)
- Re: Facility wide DR/Continuity Roland Dobbins (Jun 03)
- RE: Facility wide DR/Continuity Ricky Duman (Jun 03)
- Re: Facility wide DR/Continuity William Herrin (Jun 03)
- Re: Facility wide DR/Continuity Brandon Galbraith (Jun 03)
- Re: Facility wide DR/Continuity Roland Dobbins (Jun 03)
- Re: Facility wide DR/Continuity Stefan (Jun 03)
- Re: Facility wide DR/Continuity Bill Woodcock (Jun 03)
- Re: Facility wide DR/Continuity Brandon Galbraith (Jun 03)
- Re: Facility wide DR/Continuity Roland Dobbins (Jun 03)
- Re: Facility wide DR/Continuity Bill Woodcock (Jun 03)
- Re: Facility wide DR/Continuity Brandon Galbraith (Jun 03)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Facility wide DR/Continuity gb10hkzo-nanog (Jun 03)
- Re: Facility wide DR/Continuity Jim Wise (Jun 03)
- Re: Facility wide DR/Continuity gb10hkzo-nanog (Jun 03)
- Re: Facility wide DR/Continuity William Herrin (Jun 03)
- Re: Facility wide DR/Continuity gb10hkzo-nanog (Jun 03)
- Re: Facility wide DR/Continuity Jim Wise (Jun 03)