nanog mailing list archives
Re: Unicast Flooding
From: Steven King <sking () kingrst com>
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 14:45:45 -0400
Relying on a TCN would yield very inconsistent results. Lee wrote:
On 6/18/09, Brian Shope <blackwolf99999 () gmail com> wrote:Thanks for all the good info.. So it sounds like changing my CAM timeout to 4 hours is the best suggestion. Anyone have any problems when implementing this?Not as long as all the user ports have portfast enabled. Without portfast, when a port goes up or down it causes a topology change notification which sets the fast aging timer and the cam table entries age out in something like 15 seconds. Regards, Lee
-- Steve King Network Engineer - Liquid Web, Inc. Cisco Certified Network Associate CompTIA Linux+ Certified Professional CompTIA A+ Certified Professional
Current thread:
- Unicast Flooding Brian Shope (Jun 17)
- RE: Unicast Flooding Matthew Huff (Jun 17)
- Re: Unicast Flooding Steven King (Jun 17)
- RE: Unicast Flooding Deepak Jain (Jun 17)
- RE: Unicast Flooding Holmes,David A (Jun 17)
- Re: Unicast Flooding Steven King (Jun 17)
- Re: Unicast Flooding Brian Shope (Jun 18)
- Re: Unicast Flooding Lee (Jun 18)
- Re: Unicast Flooding Steven King (Jun 18)
- RE: Unicast Flooding Matthew Huff (Jun 17)
- Re: Unicast Flooding Jeff Kell (Jun 18)
- Re: Unicast Flooding Steven King (Jun 18)
- Re: Unicast Flooding Julio Arruda (Jun 18)