nanog mailing list archives
Re: spamhaus drop list
From: Robert Bonomi <bonomi () mail r-bonomi com>
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 13:08:06 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 19:49:36 -0400 From: Bret Clark <bclark () spectraaccess com> Subject: Re: spamhaus drop list John Levine wrote:Not that I've ever seen. Nobody else has the breadth of data that Spamhaus does. I've been using it for ages and based on zero complaints, it's never blocked anything that any of my users wanted. R's, JohnI have to agree with this...I'm somewhat surprised to see some of the comments here.
Methinks "consider the source", when evaluating the 'meaningfulness' of the comlaints, goes a long way towards clarifying the situation. In -that- light, I'm really not all that 'surprised' at what shook loose from the belfry.
Current thread:
- Re: spamhaus drop list, (continued)
- Re: spamhaus drop list Patrick W. Gilmore (Jun 16)
- Re: spamhaus drop list J.D. Falk (Jun 17)
- Re: spamhaus drop list John Levine (Jun 16)
- Re: spamhaus drop list Bret Clark (Jun 16)
- Re: spamhaus drop list Rich Kulawiec (Jun 18)
- RE: spamhaus drop list Michiel Klaver (Jun 17)
- RE: spamhaus drop list Raymond Dijkxhoorn (Jun 17)
- Re: spamhaus drop list Suresh Ramasubramanian (Jun 17)
- Re: spamhaus drop list Sean Donelan (Jun 17)
- Re: spamhaus drop list Suresh Ramasubramanian (Jun 17)