nanog mailing list archives
Re: ftc shuts down a colo and ip provider
From: Gadi Evron <ge () linuxbox org>
Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2009 15:04:04 +0300
Christopher Morrow wrote:
On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 1:44 AM, Deepak Jain<deepak () ai net> wrote:What does it say about these providers AUP that the FTC needed to go to court to turn them off?I hate to re-start the atrivo/intercage/mccolo thread(s) but, often what happens is there just arent any real/usable complaints sent along to the upstream providers.
Chris, I think enough time has past that it should be safe now to release the full story into public consumption, and open a public debate on the subjects at hand.
What do you think? Gadi.
Current thread:
- ftc shuts down a colo and ip provider Randy Bush (Jun 04)
- Re: ftc shuts down a colo and ip provider Andrew D Kirch (Jun 04)
- Re: ftc shuts down a colo and ip provider Christopher Morrow (Jun 04)
- Re: ftc shuts down a colo and ip provider Michael Painter (Jun 04)
- Re: ftc shuts down a colo and ip provider Jo Rhett (Jun 22)
- Re: ftc shuts down a colo and ip provider Peter Dambier (Jun 23)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: ftc shuts down a colo and ip provider Deepak Jain (Jun 04)
- Re: ftc shuts down a colo and ip provider Christopher Morrow (Jun 04)
- Re: ftc shuts down a colo and ip provider Gadi Evron (Jun 05)
- Re: ftc shuts down a colo and ip provider Christopher Morrow (Jun 05)
- Re: ftc shuts down a colo and ip provider Christopher Morrow (Jun 04)
- Re: ftc shuts down a colo and ip provider Wayne E. Bouchard (Jun 05)
- Re: ftc shuts down a colo and ip provider Andrew D Kirch (Jun 04)