nanog mailing list archives
Re: Subnet Size for BGP peers.
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike () swm pp se>
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 11:04:09 +0200 (CEST)
On Thu, 30 Jul 2009, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
I don't remember if you have to do local-proxy-arp or not, but if you're running bgp you could always do next-hop-self to be sure it hops via the gateway.
I did remember that this is identical to the behaviour described in RFC3069.
-- Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike () swm pp se
Current thread:
- Subnet Size for BGP peers. Jim Wininger (Jul 29)
- Re: Subnet Size for BGP peers. Nathan Ward (Jul 29)
- RE: Subnet Size for BGP peers. Paul Stewart (Jul 29)
- Re: Subnet Size for BGP peers. Benjamin Billon (Jul 29)
- Re: Subnet Size for BGP peers. Mikael Abrahamsson (Jul 29)
- Re: Subnet Size for BGP peers. Mikael Abrahamsson (Jul 30)
- Re: Subnet Size for BGP peers. Mikael Abrahamsson (Jul 29)
- Re: Subnet Size for BGP peers. Barton F Bruce (Jul 29)
- Re: Subnet Size for BGP peers. Doug McIntyre (Jul 30)
- Re: Subnet Size for BGP peers. Roy (Jul 30)
- Re: Subnet Size for BGP peers. Doug McIntyre (Jul 30)
- Re: Subnet Size for BGP peers. Adrian Minta (Jul 30)