nanog mailing list archives

RE: Nanog mentioned on BBC news website


From: Winn Johnston <WJohnston () induscorp com>
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2009 17:18:07 -0400

Very well put Bill :)

Winn Johnston
Linux Systems Administrator 

________________________________________
From: William Herrin [herrin-nanog () dirtside com]
Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2009 4:38 PM
To: Jim Mercer
Cc: NANOG list
Subject: Re: Nanog mentioned on BBC news website

On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 7:27 AM, Jim Mercer<jim () reptiles org> wrote:
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 08:44:21PM -0400, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
My fav part:
<quote>
"That's precisely how packets move around the internet, sometimes in a
many as 25 or 30 hops with the intervening entities passing the data
around having no contractual or legal obligation to the original
sender or to the receiver."
</quote>

How many of you pass packets without getting paid?

in the case of intervening entities, it is true that they have no link to
the sender or receiver.  my packets from office to home can traverse at 3
or more networks that are not paid by me, or my company.

If I pay you to send my packets and you pay bob to send my packets
then I have paid bob to send my packets. Transitive property of
payment. ;-)

'Couse bob doesn't pay claire anything but denise pays claire to
receive packets for denise, my packets are intended for denise and bob
and claire have a peering agreement in which they agree to swap
already-paid traffic directly rather than both paying ed to do it for
them.

So it ain't free and at each step there is a contractual obligation to
at least one of the sender or receiver.

Regards,
Bill

--
William D. Herrin ................ herrin () dirtside com  bill () herrin us
3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/>
Falls Church, VA 22042-3004


______________________________________________________________________
This inbound email was scanned by MessageLabs
_____________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________
This email was scanned by MessageLabs
_____________________________________________________________________


Current thread: