nanog mailing list archives
Re: Quick question about inbound route-selection
From: Joe Provo <nanog-post () rsuc gweep net>
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 09:48:32 -0400
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 09:45:24AM -0400, Drew Weaver wrote:
Howdy, Keep in mind I am basing this 'idea' off of fixed orbit's data which can sometimes be a bit out of date, etc.
Understatement. [snip]
I realize that we can use communities, and prepends to control the inbound flow, I am just speaking from a purely natural standpoint.
Since your inbound is someone else's outbound, presuming any kind of "natural flow" without accounting for the remote end's sending policies is unreasonable. Cheers, Joe -- RSUC / GweepNet / Spunk / FnB / Usenix / SAGE
Current thread:
- Quick question about inbound route-selection Drew Weaver (Jul 16)
- Re: Quick question about inbound route-selection Joe Provo (Jul 16)
- Re: Quick question about inbound route-selection Richard A Steenbergen (Jul 16)
- RE: Quick question about inbound route-selection Deepak Jain (Jul 16)
- Re: Quick question about inbound route-selection Wayne E. Bouchard (Jul 16)
- Re: Quick question about inbound route-selection Patrick W. Gilmore (Jul 17)
- RE: Quick question about inbound route-selection Deepak Jain (Jul 16)
- Re: Quick question about inbound route-selection Anton Kapela (Jul 17)