nanog mailing list archives
Re: AT&T and having two BGP peers
From: "Alex H. Ryu" <r.hyunseog () ieee org>
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 13:18:58 -0500
If it is the way AT&T have designed their product, there may be no other way around.
From AT&T's viewpoint, it will add more complexity to troubleshoot.
If you pay extra, AT&T may have some solution for you. Alex Antonio Querubin wrote:
On Fri, 10 Jul 2009, Jay Nakamura wrote:We are getting an Ethernet DIA circuit from AT&T but they insist that they can't BGP peer with 2 routers on our side. The WAN circuit can only have /30 they say. Has anyone been able to successfully talk them in to bending their rule? If so, how?Sounds odd. They do IPv6 tunnels using 2 tunnels/routers. The /30 reason is even more odd for an ethernet circuit. Antonio Querubin whois: AQ7-ARIN
Current thread:
- AT&T and having two BGP peers Jay Nakamura (Jul 10)
- Re: AT&T and having two BGP peers Patrick W. Gilmore (Jul 10)
- Re: AT&T and having two BGP peers Antonio Querubin (Jul 10)
- Re: AT&T and having two BGP peers Alex H. Ryu (Jul 10)
- Re: AT&T and having two BGP peers Stephen Kratzer (Jul 13)
- Re: AT&T and having two BGP peers Jay Nakamura (Jul 15)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: AT&T and having two BGP peers Warren Bailey (Jul 10)
- Re: AT&T and having two BGP peers Bret Clark (Jul 10)
- RE: AT&T and having two BGP peers Paul Stewart (Jul 10)
- Re: AT&T and having two BGP peers Bret Clark (Jul 10)
- RE: AT&T and having two BGP peers Carlos Alcantar (Jul 10)