nanog mailing list archives
Re: inauguration streams review
From: Florian Weimer <fw () deneb enyo de>
Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 15:58:43 +0100
* Adam Greene:
Hi, quick question ... Most people here said they saw most of the inauguration traffic on TCP1935 to Limelight and UDP8247 to CNN. However, we were seeing it simply as "http" traffic (i.e. port 80), which made it very difficult to manage. Our inbound bandwidth was effectively maxed out for about 6 hours.
80/TCP is often used as fallback if the other methods fail to work. Have you got any filters on your network which might cause this?
Current thread:
- inauguration streams review Fred Heutte (Jan 20)
- Re: inauguration streams review Mike Lyon (Jan 20)
- Re: inauguration streams review Jack Carrozzo (Jan 20)
- Re: inauguration streams review Peter Beckman (Jan 21)
- Re: inauguration streams review Jack Carrozzo (Jan 21)
- Re: inauguration streams review Mike Lyon (Jan 21)
- RE: inauguration streams review Paul Stewart (Jan 21)
- Re: inauguration streams review Jack Carrozzo (Jan 21)
- Re: inauguration streams review Adam Greene (Jan 22)
- Re: inauguration streams review Florian Weimer (Jan 24)
- Re: inauguration streams review Mike (Jan 24)
- Re: inauguration streams review Hank Nussbacher (Jan 24)
- Re: inauguration streams review isabel dias (Jan 26)
- Re: inauguration streams review Jack Carrozzo (Jan 20)
- Re: inauguration streams review Mike Lyon (Jan 20)