nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 Confusion
From: Matthew Moyle-Croft <mmc () internode com au>
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 13:40:35 +1030
On 19/02/2009, at 12:27 PM, Nathan Ward wrote:
From other discussion with you, your main concern is vendor support for a few things, right?
The issue is that the vendors aren't actually sure what to implement because there's a distinct lack of standards as opposed to competing drafts, p***ing contests, turf wars etc.
What exactly do I ask vendors (as a group) to implement so that when I do, it's what everyone else is going to be following the same path?
Is there actually a set of things that can be put together to work so that customer can experience hassle free internet in the same way as they do with IPv4?
My discussions with people in the last few weeks regarding where it's all at and how I might do IPv6 broadband have made me feel despair not happiness about the future with this. It's people inside the standards bodies that also seem frustrated with this situation.
MMC -- Matthew Moyle-Croft Internode/Agile Peering and Core Networks
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 Confusion, (continued)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Nathan Ward (Feb 18)
- Greedy Routing Rod Beck (Feb 18)
- Re: Greedy Routing Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 18)
- RE: Greedy Routing Deepak Jain (Feb 18)
- RE: Greedy Routing Jake Mertel (Feb 18)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Adrian Chadd (Feb 18)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Nathan Ward (Feb 18)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Adrian Chadd (Feb 18)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Matthew Moyle-Croft (Feb 18)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Nathan Ward (Feb 18)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Matthew Moyle-Croft (Feb 18)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Jack Bates (Feb 18)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion David Barak (Feb 18)
- RE: IPv6 Confusion Tony Hain (Feb 18)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion David Conrad (Feb 18)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Randy Bush (Feb 18)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Nick Hilliard (Feb 19)
- RE: IPv6 Confusion Tony Hain (Feb 19)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Mark Andrews (Feb 17)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 17)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Mark Andrews (Feb 17)