nanog mailing list archives
Peer Filtering
From: "Paul Stewart" <pstewart () nexicomgroup net>
Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 17:27:11 -0500
Hi folks... I would like to know whether folks are limiting their peering sessions (BGP peering at public exchanges) only by max-prefix typically? Are we the only folks trying to filter all peers using IRR information? We've run across several peers now with 10,000+ prefixes who do not register barely half their prefixes in an IRR ... meaning that we deny the rest by default. I like to think that filtering on IRR is much better (not perfect by any means) as a practice but it's probably more *practical* to just limit max-prefix peers? We can't force our peers to register at a IRR and the only party that pays the price is us in that sense.. Am I thinking right on this? ;) Cheers, Paul ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- "The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and contains confidential and/or privileged material. If you received this in error, please contact the sender immediately and then destroy this transmission, including all attachments, without copying, distributing or disclosing same. Thank you."
Current thread:
- Peer Filtering Paul Stewart (Feb 02)
- Re: Peer Filtering Martin Barry (Feb 02)
- Message not available
- Re: Peer Filtering Martin Barry (Feb 02)
- RE: Peer Filtering John van Oppen (Feb 02)
- RE: Peer Filtering Paul Stewart (Feb 03)
- Re: Peer Filtering Nick Hilliard (Feb 03)
- Message not available
- Re: Peer Filtering Martin Barry (Feb 02)