nanog mailing list archives
Re: J-series and Cisco ME3400 L2 Issues
From: Mustafa Golam - <mustafa.golam () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 15:34:57 +0300
In multi-vendor environment, being specific with L2 parameters saves a lot of troubleshooting hours and costly CSRs ;) //Mustafa On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 3:19 PM, Chuck Anderson <cra () wpi edu> wrote:
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 11:57:01AM -0600, Brad Fleming wrote:We've seen a problem getting Layer2 to function correctly with various speed and duplex settings. We tried every combo of hardcoded settings on both sides but simply couldn't resolve some L2 errors and interface resets. In the end, we found a stable setup with the J-series set to auto/auto and the ME3400 set to 100/full.What were the L2 errors? You might try asking your question on the juniper-nsp [1] and cisco-nsp [2] lists. [1] http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp [2] http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
-- -- *´¨) ¸.•´¸.•*´¨) ¸.•*¨) (¸.•´ (¸.•` *Mustafa Golam Fedora Ambassador, Bangladesh -.*.-`,`.*RHCE,CC{D,I,N,S(..),V}P`.CCIE(..)'.'`,. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MustafaGolam http://mustafa.golam.googlepages.com/home "Winners never quit------Quiters never win"
Current thread:
- J-series and Cisco ME3400 L2 Issues Brad Fleming (Feb 11)
- Re: J-series and Cisco ME3400 L2 Issues Giuliano (UOL) (Feb 11)
- Re: J-series and Cisco ME3400 L2 Issues Chuck Anderson (Feb 12)
- Re: J-series and Cisco ME3400 L2 Issues Mustafa Golam - (Feb 12)