nanog mailing list archives
Re: Network diagram software
From: Tim Chown <tjc () ecs soton ac uk>
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 08:40:26 +0000
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 04:11:38PM +0100, Mathias Wolkert wrote:
Thanks all for your input. One thing that hits me is how different networks are documented. Are there any best practice communicated (RFC/IETF)?
As an aside, for ASCII network diagrams a la Internet Draft, I found that Email Effects (http://www.sigsoftware.com/emaileffects/) was rather useful. Obviously there's only so much you can do in 80 columns of ASCII :) -- Tim
Current thread:
- Re: Network diagram software, (continued)
- Re: Network diagram software Bill Woodcock (Feb 11)
- Re: Network diagram software chuck goolsbee (Feb 11)
- Re: Network diagram software Adam Fields (Feb 11)
- Re: Network diagram software Brian Feeny (Feb 11)
- Re: Network diagram software Bill Woodcock (Feb 11)
- Re: Network diagram software Joe Provo (Feb 11)
- Re: Network diagram software Ross Vandegrift (Feb 11)
- Re: Network diagram software David Andersen (Feb 11)
- Re: Network diagram software Mathias Wolkert (Feb 11)
- Re: Network diagram software John Osmon (Feb 11)
- Re: Network diagram software Malte von dem Hagen (Feb 11)
- Message not available
- Re: Network diagram software Tim Chown (Feb 12)
- Re: Network diagram software Randy Bush (Feb 12)
- Re: Network diagram software David Andersen (Feb 11)
- Re: Network diagram software Brad Fleming (Feb 11)
- RE: Network diagram software Stephens, Josh (Feb 11)
- RE: Network diagram software Howard C. Berkowitz (Feb 11)
- Re: Network diagram software Marshall Eubanks (Feb 11)