nanog mailing list archives
RE: IPv6 delivery model to end customers
From: "TJ" <trejrco () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 09:01:08 -0500
My pleasure, now everyone - feel free to ring up your local sales/support rep and "encourage" their product to implement this ... please!What about "DHCPv6 / DHCPV6-PD" sniffing (and using that info to create L3 filter rules in L2 devices), is a standard needed or is it obvious to vendors how to implement it?
An analogy to "DHCP Guard" - yes, please do encourage them to also do this. (And an RFC might not be a bad idea ... ) While we are at it - MLD Snooping should (IMHO) be a switch's default behavior as well!
Current thread:
- RE: IPv6 delivery model to end customers, (continued)
- RE: IPv6 delivery model to end customers John Lee (Feb 07)
- RE: IPv6 delivery model to end customers Pekka Savola (Feb 09)
- RE: IPv6 delivery model to end customers Mikael Abrahamsson (Feb 09)
- RE: IPv6 delivery model to end customers Soucy, Ray (Feb 09)
- Re: IPv6 delivery model to end customers Mark Tinka (Feb 09)
- RE: IPv6 delivery model to end customers TJ (Feb 09)
- RE: IPv6 delivery model to end customers TJ (Feb 09)
- RE: IPv6 delivery model to end customers Soucy, Ray (Feb 09)
- RE: IPv6 delivery model to end customers TJ (Feb 09)
- RE: IPv6 delivery model to end customers Mikael Abrahamsson (Feb 09)
- RE: IPv6 delivery model to end customers TJ (Feb 10)
- Re: IPv6 delivery model to end customers Marshall Eubanks (Feb 10)
- Re: FW: IPv6 delivery model to end customers Mark Tinka (Feb 09)