nanog mailing list archives
Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space
From: Suresh Ramasubramanian <ops.lists () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 21:22:49 +0530
unless a site you want to reach is on the ip you are using... On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 9:18 PM, Trey Darley <trey () kingfisherops com> wrote:
Hi, y'all - Some colleagues and I are running into a bit of a problem. We've been using RFC 1918 Class A space but due to the way subnets have been allocated we are pondering the use of public IP space. As the network in question is strictly closed I don't anticipate any problems with this as the addresses would be unambiguous within our environment. I'm curious if anyone else is doing this. I'd be very interested in corresponding off-list with anyone who's in a similar position. Cheers, --Trey ++----------------------------------------------------------------------------++ Kingfisher Operations Trey Darley - Principal
-- Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.lists () gmail com)
Current thread:
- Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Trey Darley (Feb 02)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Suresh Ramasubramanian (Feb 02)
- RE: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Paul Stewart (Feb 02)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space sthaug (Feb 02)
- Re: Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space mikelieman (Feb 02)
- RE: Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Matlock, Kenneth L (Feb 02)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Colin Alston (Feb 02)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Chuck Anderson (Feb 02)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space sthaug (Feb 02)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space D'Arcy J.M. Cain (Feb 02)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 02)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Chris Meidinger (Feb 02)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space D'Arcy J.M. Cain (Feb 02)