Re: One /22 Two ISP no BGP

["Michael Smith" <msmith () internap com>]

Ebgp multi-hop is a great idea.

Have others seen this done for non-bandwidth customers?  ...a 'bgp-only' service...?...

...catalog that right along with v6 and multicast tunnels...



----- Original Message -----
From: Joe Maimon <jmaimon () ttec com>
To: Jason Biel <jason () biel-tech com>
Cc: nanog () nanog org <nanog () nanog org>
Sent: Fri Feb 06 13:13:14 2009
Subject: Re: One /22 Two ISP no BGP



Jason Biel wrote:
> Charles,
>
> As I mentioned earlier, you'll want to have one provider announce the /22
> unweighted and the other announce it weighted.  Just pick the better of the
> two providers as the primary.  Don't base it soley off bandwidth, but check
> your SLA and any recent outage occurances.
>
> Traffic will flow in via the primary until that link to you drops, the
> provider will remove the route, and traffic will come in the back up route.

Perhaps ebgp-multihop with this ISP's upstream provider might offer you 
an advantage combined with this approach.

Probably worth a try.

> On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 11:14 AM, Charles Regan <charles.regan () gmail com>wrote:
>
> > I'll explain. We are a small ISP on a very remote Island.
> > We have a /22 from ARIN. We have a 20mbits pipe from ISP1 and 20mbits from
> > ISP2.
> >
> > They are the only two we can get bandwidth.
> >
> > So we are stuck with ISP1 that doesn't support BGP.
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 12:48 PM, Azinger, Marla
> > <marla.azinger () frontiercorp com> wrote:
> > > im curiouse.  you probably had a reason for wanting to do that.  So cant
> > you find another ISP that will do what you want?
> > > Cheers
> > > Marla
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Charles Regan [mailto:charles.regan () gmail com]
> > > Sent: Friday, February 06, 2009 8:29 AM
> > > To: nanog () nanog org
> > > Subject: One /22 Two ISP no BGP
> > >
> > > I want to advertise my /22 to two different ISP on different POP.
> > >
> > > I can't use BGP as ISP1 doesn't support it.
> > >
> > > Any suggestions ?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Charles