nanog mailing list archives

Re: MAC address confusion


From: Saku Ytti <saku+nanog () ytti fi>
Date: Sun, 1 Mar 2009 00:40:00 +0200

On (2009-02-28 22:38 +0100), JAKO Andras wrote:

Hey,

http://standards.ieee.org/regauth/oui/oui.txt
02-07-01   (hex)            RACAL-DATACOM

After enabling DECnet routing, the interface MAC address turns to 
something like this:
  Hardware is BCM1250 Internal MAC, address is aa00.0400.0a04 (bia 000b.bffd.fc1a)
AA-00-04   (hex)              DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORPORATION

in the list. I don't know what 02-07-01 is, but I guess that could be 
something similar: The OUI belongs to a company, but they don't use the 
addresses to burn them into interface cards.

I guess you shouldn't be able to assign 02 (or AA) to a company for ethernet
number, much in the same way you shouldn't be able to assign RFC1918.
However you are right, it seems that these are unexplained exceptions to rules:

http://www.iana.org/assignments/ethernet-numbers
'some of the known addresses do not follow the scheme (e.g., AA0003; 02xxxx)'

Would be interesting to see what are the historical reasons.Perhaps they simply
predate the scheme or some might not even co-exist in ethernet network to begin
with, in which case they might be better documented elsewhere.
  In any case, to avoid collision with history, better start with 06 which
seems cruft free, instead of 02, when choosing local MAC address prefix.

As a side note, the 40 prefix used as local MAC in IXP here, seems to be
just mistake in assuming ethernet follows tokenring in numbering scheme.
-- 
  ++ytti


Current thread: