nanog mailing list archives
Re: 23456 without AS4_PATH?
From: Egor Zimin <lesnix () gmail com>
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 19:38:31 +0300
Take a watch on this route: show route 195.128.231.0/24 detail [..omitted..] AS path: AS2 PA[5]: 39792 35320 AS_TRANS AS_TRANS 35748 AS path: AS4 PA[4]: 35320 3.21 AS_TRANS 35748 AS path: Merged[5]: 39792 35320 3.21 AS_TRANS 35748 I [...omitted...] AS4_PATH contain AS_TRANS, it's also RFC violation, isn't it ? sthaug () nethelp no пишет:
Anyone else seeing this: *> 91.196.186.0/24 62.237.167.25 0 3292 3549 15703 43531 23456 i http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4893.txt 6. Transition An OLD BGP speaker MUST NOT use AS_TRANS as its Autonomous System number.Seeing it here too. On our 4-byte capable routers: 91.196.186.0/24 *[BGP/170] 1d 13:36:53, MED 0, localpref 105, from 193.75.0.204 AS path: 16150 15703 43531 AS_TRANS I AS path: 3356 6461 15703 43531 AS_TRANS I AS path: 1299 3549 15703 43531 AS_TRANS I And on our non 4-byte capable routers it is simply shown as 23456. This ASN should not be used to originate prefixes, agreed. Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sthaug () nethelp no
--С уважением, Егор Зимин
Current thread:
- 23456 without AS4_PATH? Saku Ytti (Feb 28)
- Re: 23456 without AS4_PATH? sthaug (Feb 28)
- Re: 23456 without AS4_PATH? Egor Zimin (Feb 28)
- Re: 23456 without AS4_PATH? sthaug (Feb 28)
- Re: 23456 without AS4_PATH? Saku Ytti (Feb 28)
- Re: 23456 without AS4_PATH? Egor Zimin (Feb 28)
- Re: 23456 without AS4_PATH? sthaug (Feb 28)