nanog mailing list archives

Re: [ MDVSA-2009:054 ] nagios (fwd)

From: Gadi Evron <ge () linuxbox org>
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 01:19:47 -0600 (CST)

On Wed, 25 Feb 2009, Eric Gearhart wrote:


I hate to be pedantic but is this something that should get forwarded
to NANOG?  I guess the relevance is justified because a lot of network
folks run Nagios...?

As long as network operators related vulns don't start showing up everycouple of months or so, I think so.

Current thread:

[ MDVSA-2009:054 ] nagios (fwd) Gadi Evron (Feb 25)
- Re: [ MDVSA-2009:054 ] nagios (fwd) Eric Gearhart (Feb 25)
  - Re: [ MDVSA-2009:054 ] nagios (fwd) Jack Bates (Feb 25)
    - Re: [ MDVSA-2009:054 ] nagios (fwd) jamie rishaw (Feb 25)
    - Re: [ MDVSA-2009:054 ] nagios (fwd) Eric Gearhart (Feb 25)
  - Re: [ MDVSA-2009:054 ] nagios (fwd) Gadi Evron (Feb 25)