nanog mailing list archives
Re: Chinese bgp metering story
From: Steven Bellovin <smb () cs columbia edu>
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 13:32:02 -0500
On Dec 18, 2009, at 1:27 PM, Bill Woodcock wrote:
On Fri, 18 Dec 2009, Joly MacFie wrote:I have posted sa comment on this from ISOC England on http://www.isoc-ny.org/p2/?p=134 Please feel free to add comments there.If anyone has questions about this, the "invited experts" who managed to wedge their feet in the door at the Kampala meeting were myself, Nishal Goburdhan (AfriNIC), and Michuki Mwangi (ISOC). Any of us would be happy to discuss it. We were there by the grace of the U.S. delegation, which fights the good fight on the Internet's behalf in intergovernmental negotiations like this.
Could you post a summary, in appropriate technical terms, of precisely what is being requested, and what changes to BGP they want? --Steve Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb
Current thread:
- Chinese bgp metering story Joly MacFie (Dec 18)
- Re: Chinese bgp metering story Bill Woodcock (Dec 18)
- Re: Chinese bgp metering story Steven Bellovin (Dec 18)
- Re: Chinese bgp metering story Fred Baker (Dec 18)
- Re: Chinese bgp metering story Steven Bellovin (Dec 18)
- Re: Chinese bgp metering story Jonny Martin (Dec 18)
- Re: Chinese bgp metering story Marshall Eubanks (Dec 18)
- Re: Chinese bgp metering story Dobbins, Roland (Dec 18)
- Re: Chinese bgp metering story James Hess (Dec 18)
- Re: Chinese bgp metering story Dobbins, Roland (Dec 18)
- Re: Chinese bgp metering story Adrian Chadd (Dec 19)
- Re: Chinese bgp metering story Paolo Lucente (Dec 19)
- Re: Chinese bgp metering story Randy Bush (Dec 19)
- Re: Chinese bgp metering story Steven Bellovin (Dec 18)
- Re: Chinese bgp metering story Bill Woodcock (Dec 18)