nanog mailing list archives

Re: Arrogant RBL list maintainers


From: Dave CROCKER <dhc2 () dcrocker net>
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 07:43:36 -0800



On 12/10/2009 7:29 AM, Sam Hayes Merritt, III wrote:
As previously noted in this thread, msullivan@sorbs did a fairly good
job of documenting this in an RFC draft. I'd say its still the primary
goto to point people at for how to do things the "right way".

http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-msullivan-dnsop-generic-naming-schemes-00


The time to pursue something like this in the IETF is when there is a substantial industry consensus that it is the right approach and that the folks supporting it will actually use it.

Are those of you who have participated in this thread willing to conform to the model specified in this draft?

d/

--

  Dave Crocker
  Brandenburg InternetWorking
  bbiw.net


Current thread: