nanog mailing list archives
Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests [re "impacting revenue"]
From: Michael Dillon <wavetossed () googlemail com>
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 13:12:42 +0100
Actually, being a CTO of a company, I know that my CEO signs things ALL the time based just on my say so. I don't see how signing a document for ARIN would land them in court, further if he were to go to court, he'd simply say that he relied on the opinions of his technical staff since he does not have the experience or expertise to evaluate it's validity. And as history shows, this is an acceptable answer, it happens all the time in the case of financial filings that others produce for the CEO to sign.
It didn't work very well for the CEOs of Worldcom, Enron and Tyco, I think that many company officers will ask to see the results of an audit before they sign this document, and they will want the audit to be performed by qualified CPAs. Are your IPv4 records in good enough shape that an accountant will sign off on them? --Michael Dillon
Current thread:
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests [re "impacting revenue"], (continued)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests [re "impacting revenue"] Fred Baker (Apr 21)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests [re "impacting revenue"] Jo Rhett (Apr 21)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests [re "impacting revenue"] Roger Marquis (Apr 21)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests [re "impacting revenue"] Shane Ronan (Apr 21)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests [re "impacting revenue"] Kevin Loch (Apr 21)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests [re "impacting revenue"] Brandon Galbraith (Apr 21)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests [re "impacting revenue"] Shane Ronan (Apr 21)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests [re "impacting revenue"] Jo Rhett (Apr 21)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests [re "impacting revenue"] Mark Newton (Apr 21)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests [re "impacting revenue"] Shane Ronan (Apr 21)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests [re "impacting revenue"] Michael Dillon (Apr 24)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests [re "impacting revenue"] Brett Frankenberger (Apr 25)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests [re "impacting revenue"] Martin Hannigan (Apr 25)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests [re "impacting revenue"] Chris Owen (Apr 21)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests [re "impacting revenue"] Owen DeLong (Apr 21)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests [re "impacting revenue"] Owen DeLong (Apr 21)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests [re "impacting revenue"] Shane Ronan (Apr 21)
- NAT64/NAT-PT update in IETF, was: Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests [re "impacting revenue"] Iljitsch van Beijnum (Apr 22)
- Re: NAT64/NAT-PT update in IETF, was: Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests [re "impacting revenue"] Jack Bates (Apr 22)
- Re: NAT64/NAT-PT update in IETF, was: Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests [re "impacting revenue"] Iljitsch van Beijnum (Apr 22)
- Re: NAT64/NAT-PT update in IETF, was: Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests [re "impacting revenue"] Ren Provo (Apr 22)