nanog mailing list archives

Re: Broadband Subscriber Management


From: "Sharlon R. Carty" <me () sharloncarty net>
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 17:08:02 -0400

And they will never listen (TELEM).

On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 12:01 PM, Curtis Maurand <cmaurand () xyonet com>wrote:


I don't understand why DSL providers don't just administratively down the
port the customer is hooked to rather than using PPPoE which costs bandwidth
and has huge management overhead when you have to disconnect a customer.  I
made the same recommendation to the St. Maarten (Dutch) phone company
several years ago.  They weren't listening either.   That way you can rate
limit via ATM or by throttling the port administratively.

Just a suggestion


Sherwin Ang wrote:

Hello Nanog!

i just would like to see how other operators are handling
broadband/DSL subscribers in their BRAS.  Currently, we are
implementing PPPoE with AAA on our Redback SE's and Cisco boxes.  As
our subscriber base grows and grows, management of user logins,
passwords, password resets, password changes are getting really huge.
Some customers also complains about the method of logging in, asking
for an easier way to do it or dump logins altogether.  We're looking
at DHCP/CLIPS for Redback but haven't really tested it since it
requires a new license for it.  For Cisco, we've been empty so far in
looking for a solution wherein we still have accounting and
rate-limiting on subscriber vc's.

how are network operators in your areas do it?  DHCP?  if i do DHCP,
will i still have the flexibility of sending a radius reply attribute
so i could rate-limit the subscribers speed? or still offer speed on
demand via radius/time-based upgrade of their rate-limits during
off-peak hours?

thank you for any insights that you may share.


-Sherwin








-- 
--sharlon


Current thread: