nanog mailing list archives
Re: Broadband Subscriber Management
From: Nathan Ward <nanog () daork net>
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 00:45:17 +1200
On 24/04/2009, at 12:23 AM, William McCall wrote:
My understanding of the PPPoA/E deal is that SPs (originally) wanted toprevent some yahoo with a DSL modem from just being able to hook in to someone's existing DSL connection and using it, so they decided toimplemement PPPoA and require some sort of authentication to prevent thisscenario.
Also, DSL was the upgrade from dialup in many places, and dialup is generally PPP.
For ISPs, the re-engineering required north of the last mile is much less, particularly in the billing/accounting systems that no one wants to touch because they were written by that coder who left a few years ago and work just fine.
-- Nathan Ward
Current thread:
- Broadband Subscriber Management Sherwin Ang (Apr 22)
- Re: Broadband Subscriber Management Curtis Maurand (Apr 22)
- Re: Broadband Subscriber Management Larry Smith (Apr 22)
- Re: Broadband Subscriber Management Curtis Maurand (Apr 22)
- Re: Broadband Subscriber Management Larry Smith (Apr 22)
- Re: Broadband Subscriber Management Oliver Eyre (Apr 23)
- Re: Broadband Subscriber Management William McCall (Apr 23)
- Re: Broadband Subscriber Management Nathan Ward (Apr 23)
- RE: Broadband Subscriber Management Frank Bulk (Apr 23)
- Re: Broadband Subscriber Management Curtis Maurand (Apr 24)
- RE: Broadband Subscriber Management Frank Bulk (Apr 24)
- Re: Broadband Subscriber Management Bill Stewart (Apr 25)
- Re: Broadband Subscriber Management Larry Smith (Apr 22)
- Re: Broadband Subscriber Management Curtis Maurand (Apr 22)
- Re: Broadband Subscriber Management Curtis Maurand (Apr 23)
- Re: Broadband Subscriber Management Steve Bertrand (Apr 23)
- Re: Broadband Subscriber Management Leigh Porter (Apr 23)
- Re: Broadband Subscriber Management Steve Bertrand (Apr 23)