nanog mailing list archives
Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests
From: Brandon Galbraith <brandon.galbraith () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 20:16:18 -0500
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 6:39 PM, Joe Greco <jgreco () ns sol net> wrote:
So now they're going to require an attestation. Which means that they are going to require an "officer" to "attest" to the validity of the information. So the "officer," most likely not being a technical person, is going to contact ... probably the same people who made the request, ask them if they need the space. Right? And why would the answer be any different, now? ... JG --
Easier to take back resources if an officer of the company lied regarding their usage/need, no? Just a thought, although I am by no means an expert in the field of contract law. -brandon -- Brandon Galbraith Voice: 630.400.6992
Current thread:
- Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests Joe Greco (Apr 20)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests Brandon Galbraith (Apr 20)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests manolo (Apr 20)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests David Andersen (Apr 20)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests Chris Owen (Apr 20)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests Shane Ronan (Apr 20)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests Matthew Moyle-Croft (Apr 20)
- RE: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests Aaron Wendel (Apr 20)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests David Conrad (Apr 21)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests Joe Greco (Apr 21)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests Jo Rhett (Apr 20)
- RE: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests Frank Bulk - iName.com (Apr 21)
(Thread continues...)