nanog mailing list archives

Re: IXP


From: Paul Vixie <vixie () isc org>
Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 21:12:24 +0000

Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 13:17:11 -0400
From: "Steven M. Bellovin" <smb () cs columbia edu>

On Sat, 18 Apr 2009 16:58:24 +0000
bmanning () vacation karoshi com wrote:

    i make the claim that simple, clean design and execution is
best. even the security goofs will agree.   

"Even"?  *Especially* -- or they're not competent at doing security.

wouldn't a security person also know about

        http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ARP_spoofing

and know that many colo facilities now use one customer per vlan due
to this concern?  (i remember florian weimer being surprised that we
didn't have such a policy on the ISC guest network.)

if we maximize for simplicity we get a DELNI.  oops that's not fast
enough we need a switch not a hub and it has to go 10Gbit/sec/port.
looks like we traded away some simplicity in order to reach our goals.


Current thread: