nanog mailing list archives

Re: IXP

From: Bill Woodcock <woody () pch net>
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 11:54:50 -0700 (PDT)

      On Fri, 17 Apr 2009, Paul Vixie wrote:
    > with the advent of vlan tags, the whole idea of CSMA for IXP networks is passe.
    > just put each pair of peers into their own private tagged vlan.

Uh, I'm not sure whether you're being sarcastic or not.

                                -Bill

Current thread:

IXP Sharlon R. Carty (Apr 17)
- Re: IXP bmanning (Apr 17)
- Re: IXP Elmar K. Bins (Apr 17)
  - RE: IXP Ivan Pepelnjak (Apr 17)
    - Re: IXP Paul Vixie (Apr 17)
    - Re: IXP Bill Woodcock (Apr 17)
    - Re: IXP Arnold Nipper (Apr 17)
    - Re: IXP kris foster (Apr 17)
    - Re: IXP Arnold Nipper (Apr 17)
    - Re: IXP kris foster (Apr 17)
    - Re: IXP - PNI bmanning (Apr 17)
    - Re: IXP - PNI Antonio Querubin (Apr 17)
    - Re: IXP - PNI Joe Greco (Apr 17)
    - Re: IXP - PNI bmanning (Apr 17)
    - Re: IXP - PNI Paul Vixie (Apr 17)
    - Re: IXP Nuno Vieira - nfsi telecom (Apr 18)

(Thread continues...)