nanog mailing list archives

RE: Level3 funkiness


From: "Murphy, Jay, DOH" <Jay.Murphy () state nm us>
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 13:50:46 -0600

Have you been able to in the past?? The site is used for other purposes,
and the front end site that you will see is www.level3.com, not net.  So
which one?


Jay Murphy 
IP Network Specialist 
NM Department of Health 
ITSD - IP Network Operations 
Santa Fe, New Mexico 87502 
Bus. Ph.: 505.827.2851

"We move the information that moves your world." 





-----Original Message-----
From: Charles Mills [mailto:w3yni1 () gmail com] 
Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2009 1:46 PM
To: J. Oquendo
Cc: nanog () nanog org
Subject: Re: Level3 funkiness

Can't get to level3.net 63.211.236.36 or www.level3.net 4.68.95.28 from
Pittsburgh either and I peer directly with level3 with a full BGP feed.



On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 3:35 PM, J. Oquendo <sil () infiltrated net> wrote:


Anyone else experience sporadic funkiness via
Level3? I can't even reach the main website from who
knows how many networks I've tried. Also friends
and former colleagues have tried to reach the site
to no avail.

One of my machines on AT&T:
# traceroute level3.net
traceroute to level3.net (63.211.236.36), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets

 4  cr1.n54ny.ip.att.net (12.122.105.58)  11.285 ms  21.702 ms  21.477
ms
 5  ggr2.n54ny.ip.att.net (12.122.131.141)  12.712 ms  10.194 ms
16.393
ms
 6  so-8-0-0.car3.NewYork1.Level3.net (4.68.127.149)  9.975 ms  10.019
ms
 10.833 ms
 7  vlan79.csw2.NewYork1.Level3.net (4.68.16.126)  10.162 ms  10.189
ms
 14.474 ms
 8  ae-71-71.ebr1.NewYork1.Level3.net (4.69.134.69)  15.763 ms  11.166
ms
 9.725 ms
 9  ae-3-3.ebr4.Washington1.Level3.net (4.69.132.93)  16.139 ms
30.616 ms
 16.275 ms
10  ae-64-64.csw1.Washington1.Level3.net (4.69.134.178)  15.684 ms
ae-74-74.csw2.Washington1.Level3.net (4.69.134.182)  21.870 ms
ae-84-84.csw3.Washington1.Level3.net (4.69.134.186)  28.729 ms
11  ae-92-92.ebr2.Washington1.Level3.net (4.69.134.157)  17.035 ms
ae-62-62.ebr2.Washington1.Level3.net (4.69.134.145)  17.041 ms
ae-72-72.ebr2.Washington1.Level3.net (4.69.134.149)  21.940 ms
12  ae-2-2.ebr2.Chicago2.Level3.net (4.69.132.69)  31.671 ms  42.407
ms
 45.774 ms
13  ae-1-100.ebr1.Chicago2.Level3.net (4.69.132.113)  31.922 ms
32.115 ms
 38.135 ms
14  ae-3.ebr2.Denver1.Level3.net (4.69.132.61)  75.265 ms  67.528 ms
 67.937 ms
15  ge-9-0.hsa1.Denver1.Level3.net (4.68.107.35)  62.587 ms !H
ge-9-1.hsa1.Denver1.Level3.net (4.68.107.99)  62.543 ms !H
ge-9-2.hsa1.Denver1.Level3.net (4.68.107.163)  75.797 ms !H


(From Texas through Above.net)
$ traceroute level3.net|tail -n 1
traceroute to level3.net (63.211.236.36), 64 hops max, 40 byte packets
11  ge-6-2.hsa1.Denver1.Level3.net (4.68.107.131)  21.473 ms !H *
ge-6-0.hsa1.Denver1.Level3.net (4.68.107.3)  21.547 ms !H

Confirmed it can't be reached from Travelers Ins, The
Hartford, none of my connections. Anyone else seeing
issues? I'm seeing drop off from clients going through
their Atlanta interconnects with Charter and two other
providers, which I can't make sense of. I DO KNOW they
experienced some sort of issue with a TDM switch or so
they said... Very broad statements: "We know teh
interwebs are down please stand by"

I know websites are one thing, but the chances of the
website going down, a TDM switch being wacky and now
clients traversing their networks complaining all at
once seems a little out of the ordinary.

=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+
J. Oquendo
SGFA, SGFE, C|EH, CNDA, CHFI, OSCP

"It takes 20 years to build a reputation and five minutes to
ruin it. If you think about that, you'll do things
differently." - Warren Buffett

227C 5D35 7DCB 0893 95AA  4771 1DCE 1FD1 5CCD 6B5E
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x5CCD6B5E





--

______________________________________________________________________
This inbound email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security
System.
______________________________________________________________________


Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail, including all attachments is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may 
contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited 
unless specifically provided under the New Mexico Inspection of Public Records Act. If you are not the intended 
recipient, please contact the sender and destroy all copies of this message. -- This email has been scanned by the 
Sybari - Antigen Email System. 





Current thread: