nanog mailing list archives
Re: attacks on MPLS?
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 13:11:48 -0400
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 12:56 PM, Steven M. Bellovin <smb () cs columbia edu> wrote:
http://www.darkreading.com/securityservices/services/data/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=216403220
This is different from ATM or FRAME or Private lines how? In the end, MPLS is just a transport layer for the private network, if you don't secure your data over a transport, shocker, people can see it!!! (I recognize steve knows this fact already...) -Chris
Current thread:
- attacks on MPLS? Steven M. Bellovin (Apr 09)
- Re: attacks on MPLS? Christopher Morrow (Apr 09)
- Re: attacks on MPLS? Florian Weimer (Apr 10)
- Re: attacks on MPLS? Charles Wyble (Apr 09)
- Re: attacks on MPLS? Wayne E. Bouchard (Apr 09)
- Re: attacks on MPLS? Charles Wyble (Apr 09)
- Re: attacks on MPLS? Christopher Morrow (Apr 09)
- Re: attacks on MPLS? Micheal Patterson (Apr 09)
- Re: attacks on MPLS? Wayne E. Bouchard (Apr 09)
- Re: attacks on MPLS? Hector Herrera (Apr 09)
- Re: attacks on MPLS? Christian Koch (Apr 09)
- Re: attacks on MPLS? Christian Koch (Apr 09)
- Re: attacks on MPLS? Truman Boyes (Apr 10)
- Re: attacks on MPLS? Christian Koch (Apr 09)
(Thread continues...)
- Re: attacks on MPLS? Christopher Morrow (Apr 09)