nanog mailing list archives
Re: ingress SMTP
From: "Winders, Timothy A" <twinders () southplainscollege edu>
Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2008 12:53:26 -0500
On 9/3/08 12:48 PM, "Alec Berry" <alec.berry () restontech com> wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Winders, Timothy A wrote:We have not setup a port 587 smtp submit server. Our smtp servers run only on port 25.Sorry to be harsh, but that's just not the "right way to do things" these days. At the very least, you can run stunnel to allow incoming mail submission on port 465 (SMTP + SSL).So, for us, having ISPs block port 25 is a problem.Read: "for us, running a mail server is a problem"
Not harsh at all. It's reality. We do have the option for SMTP/SSL/TLS over port 25. It is only required for an authenticated session. I agree, it's not the "right way to do things". Running a mail server used to be much easier. Volunteers to help set things up "the right way" are always welcome. :-) Otherwise, it will happen "eventually". :-( Tim Winders | Associate Dean of Information Technology | South Plains College
Current thread:
- ingress SMTP *Hobbit* (Sep 03)
- Re: ingress SMTP Suresh Ramasubramanian (Sep 03)
- Re: ingress SMTP Winders, Timothy A (Sep 03)
- Re: ingress SMTP Alec Berry (Sep 03)
- Re: ingress SMTP Winders, Timothy A (Sep 03)
- Re: ingress SMTP Jason Fesler (Sep 03)
- Re: ingress SMTP Winders, Timothy A (Sep 03)
- Re: ingress SMTP Winders, Timothy A (Sep 03)
- Re: ingress SMTP Jean-François Mezei (Sep 04)
- Re: ingress SMTP Tony Finch (Sep 04)
- Re: ingress SMTP Winders, Timothy A (Sep 03)
- Re: ingress SMTP Suresh Ramasubramanian (Sep 03)
- Re: ingress SMTP Tony Finch (Sep 03)
- Re: ingress SMTP Eugeniu Patrascu (Sep 07)
- Re: ingress SMTP Michael Thomas (Sep 07)
- Re: ingress SMTP Truman Boyes (Sep 07)
- Re: ingress SMTP Eugeniu Patrascu (Sep 07)