nanog mailing list archives
Re: ingress SMTP
From: "Suresh Ramasubramanian" <ops.lists () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2008 22:36:16 +0530
On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 10:18 PM, Justin Scott <jscott () gravityfree com> wrote:
Do you operate your mailserver on a residential cablemodem or adsl rather than a business account?No, we co-lo equipment at a professional facility that our customers on any type of connection need to have access to send mail through, regardless of whether their ISP blocks the standard ports or not.
That's why you set your outbound MTA to listen - for auth'd outbound connections only - on port 587 Endless loop of dead horse beating .. ouch srs -- Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.lists () gmail com)
Current thread:
- Re: ingress SMTP, (continued)
- Re: ingress SMTP Matthew Moyle-Croft (Sep 12)
- RE: ingress SMTP Frank Bulk (Sep 13)
- Re: ingress SMTP Matthew Moyle-Croft (Sep 13)
- Re: ingress SMTP Suresh Ramasubramanian (Sep 13)
- RE: ingress SMTP Frank Bulk (Sep 13)
- Re: ingress SMTP Alec Berry (Sep 03)
- Re: ingress SMTP Stephen Sprunk (Sep 03)
- Re: ingress SMTP Simon Waters (Sep 03)
- Re: ingress SMTP Justin Scott (Sep 03)
- Re: ingress SMTP Suresh Ramasubramanian (Sep 03)
- Re: ingress SMTP Daniel Senie (Sep 03)
- Re: ingress SMTP Chris Boyd (Sep 03)
- Why not go after bots? (was: ingress SMTP) Michael Thomas (Sep 03)
- Re: Why not go after bots? Charles Wyble (Sep 03)
- Re: Why not go after bots? (was: ingress SMTP) Suresh Ramasubramanian (Sep 03)
- RE: Why not go after bots? (was: ingress SMTP) Frank Bulk (Sep 03)