nanog mailing list archives

Renesys Blog Article [Was: Re: the Intercage mess]


From: "Paul Ferguson" <fergdawgster () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 17:53:00 -0700

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 5:41 PM, Joe Provo <nanog-post () rsuc gweep net>
wrote:


The spine to do it left with suits minding the store & managing to
the tune of fickle investors.  For the same reason just refusing
deaggregates has become difficult: the bad guys shield themselves
by sitting in the same prefix/ASNs with sites your paying customers
wish to reach.   The suits are interested in
- avoiding PR hassles
- low call rates into the support centers
- lower customer-churn numbers for their investor calls

Therefore anyone with time & energy to block badness where there
is collateral damage rarely has the stamina or internal political
capital to have the suits' spin machine on their side.   More
network companies that are privately held with actual technocrats
at the helm might help bring a vision beyond commoditization and
marketing.


Just a side-note: Rensys has an interesting blog article up today on this
Atrivo/Intercage "mess":

http://www.renesys.com/blog/2008/09/internet_vigilantism_1.shtml

FYI,

- - ferg

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP Desktop 9.6.3 (Build 3017)

wj8DBQFI2uDeq1pz9mNUZTMRAjCxAKCFwIw4PahuGBTzbRwumog45mQp2QCg/K5D
egFWNn4uBnN3Rfyi5Npjfes=
=DvXt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



-- 
"Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson
 Engineering Architecture for the Internet
 fergdawgster(at)gmail.com
 ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/


Current thread: