nanog mailing list archives
Re: Internet Traffic Begins to Bypass the U.S.
From: Max Tulyev <president () ukraine su>
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2008 12:18:40 +0300
Jean-François Mezei wrote:
Did western europe ever really have a primary route via the USA to reach asia ? (I realise that during the cable cuts in middle east last year, traffic might have been rerouted via USA but this would be a temporary situation).
Yes.And the main issue is not technical, but economic and disorganisation question.
For example, we need an Internet connectivity in Kazakhstan. The path through TAE (www.taeint.net) or FLAG-Iran-Turkmenistan-Uzbekistan costs about $6000 per 1Mbit, and lot of nervous. Path through China-USA is said about $100-$400 per 1Mbps and easy to get comparing with first two ones..
Yes, Europe-Asia satellites is a good way too, and it can give less latency than Europe-USA-Asia in some cases. A lot of traffic to Asia and Middle East is going this way. But satellite is expensive, and there is even lack of capacity there. So Fiber around the world is cheaper in most cases.
-- WBR, Max Tulyev (MT6561-RIPE, 2:463/253@FIDO)
Current thread:
- Re: Internet Traffic Begins to Bypass the U.S., (continued)
- Re: Internet Traffic Begins to Bypass the U.S. Matthew Moyle-Croft (Sep 14)
- Re: Internet Traffic Begins to Bypass the U.S. Mark Prior (Sep 16)
- Re: Internet Traffic Begins to Bypass the U.S. Joe Abley (Sep 14)
- Re: Internet Traffic Begins to Bypass the U.S. Matthew Moyle-Croft (Sep 14)
- Re: Internet Traffic Begins to Bypass the U.S. Joe Abley (Sep 15)
- Re: Internet Traffic Begins to Bypass the U.S. Matthew Moyle-Croft (Sep 15)
- Re: Internet Traffic Begins to Bypass the U.S. Geoff Huston (Sep 15)
- Re: Internet Traffic Begins to Bypass the U.S. Florian Weimer (Sep 15)
- RE: Internet Traffic Begins to Bypass the U.S. Rod Beck (Sep 15)
- Re: Internet Traffic Begins to Bypass the U.S. Max Tulyev (Sep 16)