nanog mailing list archives
Re: an effect of ignoring BCP38
From: Jo Rhett <jrhett () netconsonance com>
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 09:57:23 -0700
On Sep 11, 2008, at 6:32 AM, Pekka Savola wrote:
FWIW, based on off-list discussion, Jo's disagreement seems to stem from a misunderstanding of how loose uRPF works (he didn't know it accepts any packet that has a route in the routing table).
Um, no. Because if you put loose mode uRPF on your edges you aren't implementing BCP38 now are you?
I don't care how it is deployed. That's your job ;-) -- Jo RhettNet Consonance : consonant endings by net philanthropy, open source and other randomness
Current thread:
- Re: BCP38 dismissal, (continued)
- Re: BCP38 dismissal Patrick W. Gilmore (Sep 04)
- Re: BCP38 dismissal Gadi Evron (Sep 04)
- an effect of ignoring BCP38 bmanning (Sep 04)
- Re: an effect of ignoring BCP38 David Sinn (Sep 05)
- Re: an effect of ignoring BCP38 k claffy (Sep 06)
- Re: an effect of ignoring BCP38 Valdis . Kletnieks (Sep 08)
- Re: an effect of ignoring BCP38 Jo Rhett (Sep 11)
- Re: an effect of ignoring BCP38 Pekka Savola (Sep 11)
- Re: an effect of ignoring BCP38 Jo Rhett (Sep 11)
- Re: an effect of ignoring BCP38 Pekka Savola (Sep 11)
- Re: an effect of ignoring BCP38 Jo Rhett (Sep 11)
- Re: an effect of ignoring BCP38 Valdis . Kletnieks (Sep 11)
- Re: an effect of ignoring BCP38 Jo Rhett (Sep 11)
- Re: an effect of ignoring BCP38 Pekka Savola (Sep 11)
- Re: an effect of ignoring BCP38 Kevin Oberman (Sep 11)
- Re: an effect of ignoring BCP38 Kevin Oberman (Sep 11)
- Re: an effect of ignoring BCP38 Valdis . Kletnieks (Sep 11)
- Re: an effect of ignoring BCP38 Randy Bush (Sep 07)
- Re: an effect of ignoring BCP38 bmanning (Sep 07)
- Re: an effect of ignoring BCP38 Randy Bush (Sep 08)
- Re: an effect of ignoring BCP38 Paul Vixie (Sep 08)