nanog mailing list archives
Re: InterCage, Inc. (NOT Atrivo)
From: "Tim Franklin" <tim () pelican org>
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 11:31:51 +0100 (BST)
On Thu, September 11, 2008 10:58 am, Eugeniu Patrascu wrote:
Why should an ISP provide proof of the good behavior of their clients ? Or in your conuntry you're considered guilty until proven otherwise ?
Conversely, and sticking close to the 'clean house' metaphor, if someone has a history of tramping mud into your carpets every previous time they've visited, is it unreasonable to ask them to present clean shoes before letting them into your house again? Regards, Tim.
Current thread:
- Re: InterCage, Inc. (NOT Atrivo), (continued)
- Re: InterCage, Inc. (NOT Atrivo) Patrick W. Gilmore (Sep 12)
- Re: InterCage, Inc. (NOT Atrivo) Steve Gibbard (Sep 12)
- Re: InterCage, Inc. (NOT Atrivo) Gadi Evron (Sep 12)
- Re: InterCage, Inc. (NOT Atrivo) Christopher Morrow (Sep 12)
- Re: InterCage, Inc. (NOT Atrivo) Patrick W. Gilmore (Sep 14)
- Re: InterCage, Inc. (NOT Atrivo) Randy Bush (Sep 11)
- Re: InterCage, Inc. (NOT Atrivo) Justin Shore (Sep 22)
- Re: InterCage, Inc. (NOT Atrivo) Patrick W. Gilmore (Sep 22)
- Re: InterCage, Inc. (NOT Atrivo) Valdis . Kletnieks (Sep 22)
- Re: InterCage, Inc. (NOT Atrivo) Justin Shore (Sep 23)
- Re: InterCage, Inc. (NOT Atrivo) Tim Franklin (Sep 11)
- Re: InterCage, Inc. (NOT Atrivo) Jay R. Ashworth (Sep 08)