nanog mailing list archives
Re: ingress SMTP
From: hobbit () avian org (*Hobbit*)
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2008 12:35:24 +0000 (GMT)
I am completely convinced that abuse@ in most big providers is a black hole with an autoresponder hung off it, and nothing ever gets done with complaints. NO HUMAN ever sees them, and even if they did, most of the humans at these outfits wouldn't recognize a Received: header if it bit them in the ass. I invite and welcome anyone from the "big boyz" I named in the original question -- verizon, comcast, roadrunner, charter, bellsouth/SBC, and now Google -- *especially* Gmail, given that counterproductive "privacy" policy we noted -- to inform me otherwise. _H*
Current thread:
- Re: ingress SMTP, (continued)
- Re: ingress SMTP Mark Foster (Sep 05)
- Re: ingress SMTP Robert E. Seastrom (Sep 10)
- Re: ingress SMTP Jeff Kinz (Sep 05)
- RE: ingress SMTP Frank Bulk (Sep 03)
- Re: ingress SMTP Tony Finch (Sep 04)
- ingress SMTP Ang Kah Yik (Sep 03)
- Re: ingress SMTP Suresh Ramasubramanian (Sep 03)
- Re: ingress SMTP Ang Kah Yik (Sep 03)
- Re: ingress SMTP Suresh Ramasubramanian (Sep 03)
- Re: ingress SMTP matthew (Sep 07)
- Re: ingress SMTP Michael Thomas (Sep 07)
- Re: ingress SMTP *Hobbit* (Sep 10)
- Re: ingress SMTP *Hobbit* (Sep 13)
- Re: ingress SMTP Matthew Moyle-Croft (Sep 13)