Re: InterCage, Inc. (NOT Atrivo)

[Gadi Evron <ge () linuxbox org>]

On Mon, 8 Sep 2008, Scott Weeks wrote:
> --- ge () linuxbox org wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Sep 2008, Scott Weeks wrote:
> > --- ge () linuxbox org wrote:
> >
> > Well, perhaps you can share any information with us on a legitimate client
> > you have?
> > ----------------------------------
> >
> > Now why do you have to go there?  Just to fan the flames for fun and profit?  :-(
>
>
> I haven't seen any flames, I've seen them claim they cleaned up, instead
> of pointing out all their other bad clients, I am asking for a good one.
> Should be easy enough to manufacture.
> -------------------------------------
>
> Stop.  Please.

Scott, second attempt to get a relavnt remark out of you flame-baiting:

Do you feel future peers of Atrivo / Intercage should be making some sort 
of abuse due dilligence? How does such a process get done? Relying on 
black lists doesn't seem too reliable as a solution.

Obviously host lost some money now after buying a provider with a big 
client that was just depeered, so it is now a financial concern.

        Gadi.

> scott