nanog mailing list archives

Re: BCP38 dismissal


From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Sun, 07 Sep 2008 19:18:21 +1200

Jo Rhett wrote:
On Sep 4, 2008, at 7:24 AM, James Jun wrote:
Indeed... In today's internet, protecting your own box (cp-policer/control
plane filtering) is far more important IMO than implementing BCP38
when much
of attack traffic comes from legitimate IP sources anyway (see botnets).
I'm sorry, but nonsense statements such as these burn the blood.  Sure,
yes, protecting yourself is so much more important than protecting
anyone else.

Anyone else want to stand up and join the "I am an asshole" club?

normally i would have just hit delete.  but your ad hominem attack on
the messenger need a response.

the reality of life is that he is correct in that "attack traffic comes
from legitimate IP sources anyway."

therefore, your first duty should be to keep your hosts from joining the
massive army of botnets.

randy


Current thread: