nanog mailing list archives
Re: Force10 Gear - Opinions
From: Brian Feeny <bfeeny () mac com>
Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2008 23:54:43 -0400
On Sep 3, 2008, at 8:36 PM, Jo Rhett wrote:
That's one hell of a caveot, given that you always want strict on your customers and loose on your transit links.
Personally I have always avoided combining customers and transit providers on the same routers in ISP environments.
Brian
Current thread:
- Re: Cisco uRPF failures, (continued)
- Re: Cisco uRPF failures Christopher Morrow (Sep 06)
- Re: Cisco uRPF failures Jo Rhett (Sep 11)
- Re: Cisco uRPF failures Sam Stickland (Sep 07)
- Re: Cisco uRPF failures Saku Ytti (Sep 08)
- Re: Cisco uRPF failures Jo Rhett (Sep 11)
- Re: Cisco uRPF failures Saku Ytti (Sep 11)
- Re: Cisco uRPF failures Jo Rhett (Sep 11)
- Re: Cisco uRPF failures Brandon Ewing (Sep 13)
- Re: Cisco uRPF failures Saku Ytti (Sep 13)
- RE: Cisco uRPF failures Tom Zingale (tomz) (Sep 15)
- Re: Force10 Gear - Opinions Brian Feeny (Sep 03)
- Re: Force10 Gear - Opinions Paul Wall (Sep 04)
- Re: Force10 Gear - Opinions Mark Tinka (Sep 04)
- uRPF Jo Rhett (Sep 04)
- Re: uRPF Mark Tinka (Sep 04)