Re: GLBX De-Peers Intercage [Was: RE: Washington Post: Atrivo/Intercag e, w hy are we peering with the American RBN?]

["Paul Ferguson" <fergdawg () netzero net>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

- -- "Paul Ferguson" <fergdawg () netzero net> wrote:

> -- "Marc Sachs" <marc () sans org> wrote:

> > http://cidr-report.org/cgi-bin/as-report?as=AS27595&v=4&view=2.0

> My only concern here is that by the publicity this issue continues
> to receive, these activities will just move else where, like
> scurrying cockroaches (like what happened with AS40989).

[some elided]

I guess my effort to evoke commentary on NANOG failed.

My next question to the peanut gallery is: What do you
suggest we should do on other hosting IP blocks are are continuing
to host criminal activity, even in the face of abuse reports, etc.?

Seriously -- I think this is an issue which needs to be addressed
here. ISPs cannot continue to sweep this issue under the proverbial
carpet.

Is this an issue that network operations folk don't really care
about?

- - ferg

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP Desktop 9.6.3 (Build 3017)

wj8DBQFIu6xHq1pz9mNUZTMRAo1gAKCT0QCc65W1z8C5gsegsm6zBWDDCwCeLKac
7nVL8XmqOZiFfD18hFSFL/M=
=8pXG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


--
"Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson
 Engineering Architecture for the Internet
 fergdawg(at)netzero.net
 ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/