nanog mailing list archives
Re: Depeering as an IPv6 driver
From: Jack Bates <jbates () brightok net>
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 22:21:55 -0500
Brandon Galbraith wrote:
Not that I know of. We tried to get IPv6 transit from Cogent several months ago (we already have IPv4 transit), and were told it's not available yet.
What a shame. It's extremely miserable, but Sprint has a 6to4 at least. No clue what they have beyond that. It's been a big motivator for us peering native IPv6 so we can push our customers away from that death trap. Yeah, we can tunnel, but most tunnel peers seem low band.
Jack
Current thread:
- Re: Sprint / Cogent, (continued)
- Re: Sprint / Cogent Patrick W. Gilmore (Oct 30)
- Re: Sprint / Cogent Brandon Galbraith (Oct 30)
- Re: Sprint / Cogent Paul Fleming (Oct 30)
- Re: Sprint / Cogent Brandon Galbraith (Oct 30)
- RE: Sprint / Cogent Randy Epstein (Oct 30)
- Re: Sprint / Cogent Brandon Galbraith (Oct 30)
- Re: Sprint / Cogent Patrick W. Gilmore (Oct 30)
- Re: Sprint / Cogent Michal Krsek (Oct 30)
- Re: Depeering as an IPv6 driver (was: Re: Sprint / Cogent) Jared Mauch (Oct 30)
- Re: Depeering as an IPv6 driver (was: Re: Sprint / Cogent) Brandon Galbraith (Oct 30)
- Re: Depeering as an IPv6 driver Jack Bates (Oct 30)
- Re: Depeering as an IPv6 driver (was: Re: Sprint / Cogent) Carlos Friacas (Oct 31)
- Re: Sprint / Cogent Justin Shore (Oct 31)
- RE: Sprint / Cogent Paul Stewart (Oct 31)
- RE: Sprint / Cogent Alex Rubenstein (Oct 31)
- Re: Sprint / Cogent Larry Sheldon (Oct 31)
- Re: Sprint / Cogent Larry Sheldon (Oct 31)
- Re: Sprint / Cogent Jared Mauch (Oct 31)
- Re: Sprint / Cogent Marshall Eubanks (Oct 31)
- Re: Sprint / Cogent Patrick W. Gilmore (Oct 31)