nanog mailing list archives
Re: spurring transition to ipv6 -- make it faster
From: "Michael Simpson" <mikie.simpson () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 12:18:55 +0100
On 10/16/08, Truman Boyes <truman () suspicious org> wrote:
It's a good point that you brought up. Even though we already have IPv6 P2P (Nathan's post explains this in more detail), it would still be quite interesting to provide IPv6 as a higher class of traffic within service provider networks.
As long as none of your ipv6 traffic transits across anything from British Telecom as it is not supported on their 21st Century Network <http://aaisp.blogspot.com/2008/10/bts-21st-century-network-apparently-not.html> mike
Current thread:
- spurring transition to ipv6 -- make it faster Scott Doty (Oct 14)
- Re: spurring transition to ipv6 -- make it faster Niall Donegan (Oct 14)
- RE: spurring transition to ipv6 -- make it faster Skywing (Oct 14)
- Re: spurring transition to ipv6 -- make it faster Nathan Ward (Oct 14)
- RE: spurring transition to ipv6 -- make it faster Tomas L. Byrnes (Oct 14)
- Re: spurring transition to ipv6 -- make it faster Mark Newton (Oct 14)
- Re: spurring transition to ipv6 -- make it faster Truman Boyes (Oct 16)
- Re: spurring transition to ipv6 -- make it faster Michael Simpson (Oct 17)
- RE: spurring transition to ipv6 -- make it faster michael.dillon (Oct 17)
- Re: spurring transition to ipv6 -- make it faster Nathan Ward (Oct 17)
- Re: spurring transition to ipv6 -- make it faster Michael Simpson (Oct 17)
- Re: spurring transition to ipv6 -- make it faster Niall Donegan (Oct 14)