nanog mailing list archives
RE: routing around Sprint's depeering damage
From: "Randy Epstein" <repstein () chello at>
Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2008 23:50:07 -0500
It would be better to regulate some type of communication to customers *before* depeering occurs, much in the same way that the SEC requires publicly traded companies to communicate certain things a certain times to its shareholders.
Wait. Cogent's known about this risk factor for some time. Have they not included this in their 10-Q/K filings? Randy
Current thread:
- RE: routing around Sprint's depeering damage, (continued)
- RE: routing around Sprint's depeering damage Mikael Abrahamsson (Nov 02)
- Re: routing around Sprint's depeering damage Larry Sheldon (Nov 02)
- RE: routing around Sprint's depeering damage Daniel Senie (Nov 02)
- Re: routing around Sprint's depeering damage Anders Lindbäck (Nov 02)
- Re: routing around Sprint's depeering damage Joe Greco (Nov 02)
- Re: routing around Sprint's depeering damage Anders Lindbäck (Nov 02)
- Re: routing around Sprint's depeering damage Joe Greco (Nov 02)
- Re: routing around Sprint's depeering damage Anders Lindbäck (Nov 02)
- Re: routing around Sprint's depeering damage Marshall Eubanks (Nov 02)
- RE: routing around Sprint's depeering damage Frank Bulk (Nov 02)
- RE: routing around Sprint's depeering damage Randy Epstein (Nov 02)
- RE: routing around Sprint's depeering damage Frank Bulk (Nov 02)
- Re: routing around Sprint's depeering damage Colin Alston (Nov 02)
- Re: routing around Sprint's depeering damage Colin Alston (Nov 02)
- Re: routing around Sprint's depeering damage Florian Weimer (Nov 02)
- Re: routing around Sprint's depeering damage Eugeniu Patrascu (Nov 05)
- Re: routing around Sprint's depeering damage tvest (Nov 02)