nanog mailing list archives
Re: an over-the-top data center
From: "Patrick W. Gilmore" <patrick () ianai net>
Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 20:33:37 -0500
On Nov 28, 2008, at 4:04 PM, Jean-François Mezei wrote:
The thing about a carrier hotel is that it cannot be a secret location since you need to allow various carriers and ISPs to have physical access to the building so they can install/manage their servers/routers/switches. The advantage of this swedish data centre is that even if its location is well known, it is pretty hard to harm the building. You can't run a truck full of explosives into it for instance.
Unfortunately, you also cannot run your own fiber there, colo equipment there, visit it for any reason, etc.
I was going to say 'this probably hinders customers adoption at NetNod', but I know for a fact the "probably" is superfluous.
-- TTFN, patrick
Current thread:
- RE: an over-the-top data center, (continued)
- Message not available
- RE: an over-the-top data center Howard C. Berkowitz (Nov 28)
- RE: an over-the-top data center Gadi Evron (Nov 28)
- Re: an over-the-top data center Patrick Giagnocavo (Nov 28)
- RE: an over-the-top data center Scott Morris (Nov 28)
- Re: an over-the-top data center Simon Waters (Nov 28)
- Re: an over-the-top data center Måns Nilsson (Nov 28)
- Re: an over-the-top data center Jean-François Mezei (Nov 28)
- Re: an over-the-top data center Joe Abley (Nov 28)
- Re: an over-the-top data center Warren Kumari (Nov 28)
- Re: an over-the-top data center Patrick W. Gilmore (Nov 30)
- Re: an over-the-top data center Andrew D Kirch (Nov 30)
- RE: an over-the-top data center Tomas L. Byrnes (Nov 30)