nanog mailing list archives
Re: NAT66 and the subscriber prefix length
From: Joe Abley <jabley () hopcount ca>
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 09:51:54 -0500
On 2008-11-19, at 09:25, Eugeniu Patrascu wrote:
michael.dillon () bt com wrote:We have also started offering residential Internet to those living on campus, which has been very popular (no suprise.)You've started your own ISP. ISP's get a /32 from ARIN. Case closed. In fact, you are better off treating your non-ISP networks as a customer of your ISP and assigning a /48 to each of your non-ISP sites. This is an area where IPv4 and IPv6 differ.Too bad in Europe RIPE wants 3000EUR per month membership fees to give you PI IPv6 if you're an end user.
But surely he's not an end-user. He's an ISP, which means he's (potentially) an LIR.
Joe
Current thread:
- NAT66 and the subscriber prefix length michael.dillon (Nov 14)
- Re: NAT66 and the subscriber prefix length Mikael Abrahamsson (Nov 14)
- Re: NAT66 and the subscriber prefix length Tim Durack (Nov 18)
- Re: NAT66 and the subscriber prefix length Crist Clark (Nov 18)
- Re: NAT66 and the subscriber prefix length Tim Durack (Nov 18)
- RE: NAT66 and the subscriber prefix length michael.dillon (Nov 19)
- Re: NAT66 and the subscriber prefix length Eugeniu Patrascu (Nov 19)
- Re: NAT66 and the subscriber prefix length Joe Abley (Nov 19)
- Re: NAT66 and the subscriber prefix length Eugeniu Patrascu (Nov 19)
- Re: NAT66 and the subscriber prefix length Iljitsch van Beijnum (Nov 19)
- RE: NAT66 and the subscriber prefix length michael.dillon (Nov 19)
- Re: NAT66 and the subscriber prefix length Eugeniu Patrascu (Nov 22)
- Re: NAT66 and the subscriber prefix length Tim Durack (Nov 18)
- Re: NAT66 and the subscriber prefix length Leo Vegoda (Nov 19)
- Re: NAT66 and the subscriber prefix length Mikael Abrahamsson (Nov 14)
- Re: NAT66 and the subscriber prefix length Iljitsch van Beijnum (Nov 19)