nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 routing /48s
From: Mark Tinka <mtinka () globaltransit net>
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 07:02:18 +0800
On Tuesday 18 November 2008 06:46:08 Robert.E.VanOrmer () frb gov wrote:
Are there any parties out there routing /48 IPv6 networks globally?
We do. At present, our policy is to route up to /48. Cheers, Mark.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Current thread:
- IPv6 routing /48s Robert . E . VanOrmer (Nov 17)
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Mark Tinka (Nov 17)
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Nick Hilliard (Nov 17)
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Kevin Oberman (Nov 17)
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Michael Sinatra (Nov 17)
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Joe Abley (Nov 17)
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Owen DeLong (Nov 17)
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Frank Habicht (Nov 18)
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Owen DeLong (Nov 17)
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Nathan Ward (Nov 17)
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Joe Maimon (Nov 18)
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Christopher Morrow (Nov 18)
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Michael Sinatra (Nov 18)
(Thread continues...)