nanog mailing list archives
Re: Prefix Hijack Tool Comaprision
From: "Scott Weeks" <surfer () mauigateway com>
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 11:41:39 -0800
--- todd () renesys com wrote: From: Todd Underwood <todd () renesys com> interesting, but it's not operationally significant. i would not consider the fact that PHAS and Watchmy didn't alert any particular criticism of them. but perhaps there was something else to which you were referring. ---------------------------------- I think he was just referring to and answering my question. I hope to see how these tools work in 'small' incidents as well as large-scale incidents. Knowing the tool's capabilities increases one's ability to assess the damage while troubleshooting. scott
Current thread:
- Prefix Hijack Tool Comaprision Scott Weeks (Nov 13)
- Re: Prefix Hijack Tool Comaprision Hank Nussbacher (Nov 13)
- Re: Prefix Hijack Tool Comaprision Todd Underwood (Nov 13)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Prefix Hijack Tool Comaprision Scott Weeks (Nov 13)
- Re: Prefix Hijack Tool Comaprision Alexander Harrowell (Nov 13)
- Re: Prefix Hijack Tool Comaprision Todd Underwood (Nov 13)
- Re: Prefix Hijack Tool Comaprision Jack Bates (Nov 13)
- Re: Prefix Hijack Tool Comaprision Danny McPherson (Nov 13)
- Re: Prefix Hijack Tool Comaprision Andree Toonk (Nov 17)
- Re: Prefix Hijack Tool Comaprision Todd Underwood (Nov 13)
- Re: Prefix Hijack Tool Comaprision Alexander Harrowell (Nov 13)
- Re: Prefix Hijack Tool Comaprision Martin List-Petersen (Nov 13)
- Re: Prefix Hijack Tool Comaprision Mohit Lad (Nov 13)
- Re: Prefix Hijack Tool Comaprision Josh Karlin (Nov 13)
- Re: Prefix Hijack Tool Comaprision Hank Nussbacher (Nov 13)