nanog mailing list archives

Re: NTP Md5 or AutoKey?

From: Kurt Erik Lindqvist <kurtis () kurtis pp se>
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 14:57:21 +0100

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


On 4 nov 2008, at 07.23, Paul Ferguson wrote:


I'm just wondering -- in globak scheme of security issue, is NTP
security a major issue?

Just curious.



Maybe not NTP per se but timing is.

Best regards,

- - kurtis -



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin)

iEYEARECAAYFAkkS98IACgkQAFdZ6xrc/t5TFgCgsCtZvsgwdVvaJYflTLVPxI4D
zpQAn39r49MJ3VKU4SrHCnYoVpqpU8Ej
=chKQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Current thread:

Re: NTP Md5 or AutoKey?, (continued)
- - Re: NTP Md5 or AutoKey? Valdis . Kletnieks (Nov 03)
    - Re: NTP Md5 or AutoKey? Glen Kent (Nov 04)
    - RE: NTP Md5 or AutoKey? Lincoln Dale (Nov 04)
    - RE: NTP Md5 or AutoKey? Tony Finch (Nov 04)
    - Re: NTP Md5 or AutoKey? Kurt Erik Lindqvist (Nov 06)
    - Re: NTP Md5 or AutoKey? Steven M. Bellovin (Nov 04)
  - Re: NTP Md5 or AutoKey? bmanning (Nov 04)
    - Re: NTP Md5 or AutoKey? Glen Kent (Nov 04)
    - Re: NTP Md5 or AutoKey? Ask Bjørn Hansen (Nov 15)
    - Re: NTP Md5 or AutoKey? Joe Greco (Nov 15)
  - Re: NTP Md5 or AutoKey? Kurt Erik Lindqvist (Nov 06)