nanog mailing list archives

Re: routing around Sprint's depeering damage


From: Patrick Giagnocavo <patrick () zill net>
Date: Sun, 02 Nov 2008 08:58:45 -0500

Marc Farnum Rendino wrote:
Folks -

At some point, a society decides that X is important enough to the
society as a whole, that something official is in the overall
interest. Roads, immigration, whatever. That it's necessary to require
that some things be done (or not be done).

Peering may very well not be in that category, however I think it's
worth discussion.

- Marc

My response would be to point out the behavior of the incumbents in the
telcom industry vs. the upstarts; which are the ones responsible for
most of the innovation that actually got delivered to the market?

Regulations raise barriers to entry; which favors the incumbent over the
upstart.

Roads are a bad analogy and will only serve to obscure the discussion.

--Patrick


Current thread: